Loading...
Remove Text Formatting

Likes Likes:  111
Page 29 of 29 FirstFirst ... 192526272829
Results 281 to 290 of 290

Thread: Poor Prez Trump Can't Catch a Break......

  1. #281
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    4,619
    Quote Originally Posted by 5.4MarkVIII View Post
    as oppose to the left wings sources that lie and twist on a daily basis. give me a break you hate bias is clearly evident. If you want to call not agreeing with someone who has clearly failed as a leader over the past 2 years - sure. That's not even counting the string of "bodies" and scams behind him.


    so when Obama and the Dems where continuing to extend that "wall" it was also a bad thing and un necessary? Please respond to this fact because you keep ignoring it. or are you just gonna claim that's its fake because it doesn't fit what you want to be true? They were never advocating a "wall" - there is a fence/barrier there that was extended through vulnerable areas and/or repaired/renovated - but even this administration has indicated that an unattended "wall" is useless in some areas versus technologies like drones/cameras, patrols (to pick up identified).


    clearly you have no walls in your house becasue there is no concern with people entering without your consent. Its' also cold outside - walls have other purposes. We do not have a fence our wall around our house though, or security guards, drones, and patrols around the perimeter so not sure how you're making an equivalency. Do you have walls and barbed wire fences around your property?


    fact: illigal imagrants contiue to cross the US / mexico boarder - The majority of illegal immigrants in the US (according to the US Government) cross via other ports of entry and will continue to - if they want to reduce this then spend the money they DON'T have there.


    Fact; dems admited under obama that this was a problem and were contiuing to extend teh "wall" - They did extend the fence through the unprotected vulnerable areas (which may need upkeep but that is alrady budgeted for). They never admitted a need for a "wall" under previous governments. It was a Republican who previously advocated to "tear down that wall".


    Fact: Trump is doing the same thing by extending teh existing "wall" - Nope - this is an ego project aimed at the tiki torch crowd.


    Fact: people cant handle it for no reason other than Trump
    ^^^Funny stuff there

  2. #282
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    4,619
    Quote Originally Posted by Legwound View Post
    as previously stated, undoutedly American citizens commit crimes

    how does this make it okay to allow foreign criminals into the country?



    Obviously there is more than one way to enter the country, how does this make it okay to allow criminals to freely walk across the southern (and northern) border
    But if the objective if to save American lives, and I assume you would want to save the highest number of American lives, then why not spend the money there? If you have the choice to save 10000 people versus 100 - which option do you choose.

  3. #283
    Member Ponyryd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Windsor area
    Posts
    2,957
    ^The crimes you cited could not have been easily prevented, sick people who went nuts, plain and simple. That’s much different than illegals who come across with illegal drugs and weapons, and have no fear if committing crimes because they’ll just be deported, only to come back and do it all over again. I know in your mind it’s no problem though, and I’m sure everything I’m posting here is fake, lol. Pathetic.


    Quote Originally Posted by 92redragtop View Post
    ^^^Funny stuff there
    You keep saying our sources are unreliable, yet this is your response? Sadly it’s typical, and in no way surprises me.

  4. #284
    nom nom nom RedSN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Markham
    Posts
    10,113
    In an attempt to get this tread back on a "humorous" track.....


    You all know the Joker on the right, but guess who the Clown on the left is?
    -Don____________
    Hanlon’s Razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

  5. #285
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Oakville
    Posts
    64
    Must be the venerable NYC vampire, Giuliani, weirdo

  6. #286
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Stoney Creek
    Posts
    3,167
    you want funny, this is funny. Laura Loomer jumped the fence at Nancy Pelosi's house and is protesting

    https://thepoliticalinsider.com/laura-loomer-pelosi/

  7. #287
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Hensall
    Posts
    3,016
    Quote Originally Posted by 92redragtop View Post
    ^^^Funny stuff there
    yes indeed pretty humorous.

    Conservative media is all fake. but left media isn't because they hate Trump

    your taking the term "wall" to seriously However from the dictionary " fence -a barrier, railing, or other upright structure, typically of wood or wire, enclosing an area of ground to mark a boundary, control access, or prevent escape."
    and since the structure in question is made of metal and concrete in some areas and is what ten feet tall? it is actually more like a wall then fence, and yes Obama was extending this structure and is the same structure that Trump is extending, at the request of the people who protect the boarder. they are not walling the entire boarder simply continuing to extend and add to problem areas (you know just like Obama was)


    most property now adays have a fence (kinda like a small wall) around the perimeter to keep unwanted people out. even in areas where unwanted people are not a huge problem, it sends a clear mes to everybody that this area is mine and i want you to keep out.


    if the wall is extended to cover and better protect hard to reach areas than that would free up man power and resources to better protect ports of entry. there fore win win


    trump is doing the exact same thing. second point your just flat wrong on. search the internet, there is written and video evidence


    Was it the same for Obama? Just because people agree with securing boarders dosnt make then racist. that's just an irrational argument

  8. #288
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Stoney Creek
    Posts
    3,167
    pretty good (and brief) press conference about where the border money is allocated to, not just a wall.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbkAGpfyIwI

  9. #289
    Member Ponyryd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Windsor area
    Posts
    2,957


    Same reason I have doors and locks on my house.

  10. #290
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Stoney Creek
    Posts
    3,167
    Evidence for Google’s partisan activities is now overwhelming. President Trump has previously warned Google, as well as other Silicon Valley giants, not to engage in censorship or partisan activities. Google continues to defy him.

    ‘THE SMOKING GUN’: Google Manipulated YouTube Search Results for Abortion, Maxine Waters, David Hogg

    In sworn testimony, Google CEO Sundar Pichai told Congress last month that his company does not “manually intervene” on any particular search result. Yet an internal discussion thread leaked to Breitbart News reveals Google regularly intervenes in search results on its YouTube video platform – including a recent intervention that pushed pro-life videos out of the top ten search results for “abortion.”
    The term “abortion” was added to a “blacklist” file for “controversial YouTube queries,” which contains a list of search terms that the company considers sensitive. According to the leak, these include some of these search terms related to: abortion, abortions, the Irish abortion referendum, Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters, and anti-gun activist David Hogg.

    The existence of the blacklist was revealed in an internal Google discussion thread leaked to Breitbart News by a source inside the company who wishes to remain anonymous. A partial list of blacklisted terms was also leaked to Breitbart by another Google source.
    In the leaked discussion thread, a Google site reliability engineer hinted at the existence of more search blacklists, according to the source.

    “We have tons of white- and blacklists that humans manually curate,” said the employee. “Hopefully this isn’t surprising or particularly controversial.”

    Others were more concerned about the presence of the blacklist. According to the source, the software engineer who started the discussion called the manipulation of search results related to abortion a “smoking gun.”

    The software engineer noted that the change had occurred following an inquiry from a left-wing Slate journalist about the prominence of pro-life videos on YouTube, and that pro-life videos were replaced with pro-abortion videos in the top ten results for the search terms following Google’s manual intervention.

    “The Slate writer said she had complained last Friday and then saw different search results before YouTube responded to her on Monday,” wrote the employee. “And lo and behold, the [changelog] was submitted on Friday, December 14 at 3:17 PM.”

    The manually downranked items included several videos from Dr. Antony Levatino, a former abortion doctor who is now a pro-life activist. Another video in the top ten featured a woman’s personal story of being pressured to have an abortion, while another featured pro-life conservative Ben Shapiro. The Slate journalist who complained to Google reported that these videos previously featured in the top ten, describing them in her story as “dangerous misinformation.”

    Since the Slate journalist’s inquiry and Google’s subsequent intervention, the top search results now feature pro-abortion content from left-wing sources like BuzzFeed, Vice, CNN, and Last Week Tonight With John Oliver. In her report, the Slate journalist acknowledged that the search results changed shortly after she contacted Google.

    The manual adjustment of search results by a Google-owned platform contradicts a key claim made under oath by Google CEO Sundar Pichai in his congressional testimony earlier this month: that his company does not “manually intervene on any search result.”

    A Google employee in the discussion thread drew attention to Pichai’s claim, noting that it “seems like we are pretty eager to cater our search results to the social and political agenda of left-wing journalists.”

    One of the posts in the discussion also noted that the blacklist had previously been edited to include the search term “Maxine Waters” after a single Google employee complained the top YouTube search result for Maxine Waters was “very low quality.”

    Google’s alleged intervention on behalf of a Democratic congresswoman would be further evidence of the tech giant using its resources to prop up the left. Breitbart News previously reported on leaked emails revealing the company targeted pro-Democrat demographics in its get-out-the-vote efforts in 2016.

    According to the source, a software engineer in the thread also noted that “a bunch of terms related to the abortion referendum in Ireland” had been added to the blacklist – another change with potentially dramatic consequences on the national policies of a western democracy.

    youtube_controversial_query_blacklist

    At least one post in the discussion thread revealed the existence of a file called “youtube_controversial_query_blacklist,” which contains a list of YouTube search terms that Google manually curates. In addition to the terms “abortion,” “abortions,” “Maxine Waters,” and search terms related to the Irish abortion referendum, a Google software engineer noted that the blacklist includes search terms related to terrorist attacks. (the posts specifically mentions that the “Strasbourg terrorist attack” as being on the list).

    “If you look at the other entries recently added to the youtube_controversial_query_blacklist(e.g., entries related to the Strasbourg terrorist attack), the addition of abortion seems…out-of-place,” wrote the software engineer, according to the source.



    After learning of the existence of the blacklist, Breitbart News obtained a partial screenshot of the full blacklist file from a source within Google. It reveals that the blacklist includes search terms related to both mass shootings and the progressive anti-second amendment activist David Hogg.

    This suggests Google has followed the lead of Democrat politicians, who have repeatedly pushed tech companies to censor content related to the Parkland school shooting and the Parkland anti-gun activists. It’s part of a popular new line of thought in the political-media establishment, which views the public as too stupid to question conspiracy theories for themselves.

    Here is the partial blacklist leaked to Breitbart:

    2117 plane crash Russian

    2118 plane crash

    2119 an-148

    2120 florida shooting conspiracy

    2121 florida shooting crisis actors

    2122 florida conspiracy

    2123 florida false flag shooting

    2124 florida false flag

    2125 fake florida school shooting

    2126 david hogg hoax

    2127 david hogg fake

    2128 david hogg crisis actor

    2129 david hogg forgets lines

    2130 david hogg forgets his lines

    2131 david hogg cant remember his lines

    2132 david hogg actor

    2133 david hogg cant remember

    2134 david hogg conspiracy

    2135 david hogg exposed

    2136 david hogg lines

    2137 david hogg rehearsing

    2120 florida shooting conspiracy

    The full internal filepath of the blacklist, according to another source, is:

    //depot/google3/googledata/superroot/youtube/youtube_controversial_query_blacklist

    Contradictions

    Responding to a request for comment, a YouTube spokeswoman said the company wants to promote “authoritative” sources in its search results, but maintained that YouTube is a “platform for free speech” that “allow[s]” both pro-life and pro-abortion content.

    YouTube’s full comment:

    YouTube is a platform for free speech where anyone can choose to post videos, as long as they follow our Community Guidelines, which prohibit things like inciting violence and pornography. We apply these policies impartially and we allow both pro-life and pro-choice opinions. Over the last year we’ve described how we are working to better surface news sources across our site for news-related searches and topical information. We’ve improved our search and discovery algorithms, built new features that clearly label and prominently surface news sources on our homepage and search pages, and introduced information panels to help give users more authoritative sources where they can fact check information for themselves.

    In the case of the “abortion” search results, YouTube’s intervention to insert “authoritative” content resulted in the downranking of pro-life videos and the elevation of pro-abortion ones.

    A Google spokesperson took a tougher line than its YouTube subsidiary, stating that “Google has never manipulated or modified the search results or content in any of its products to promote a particular political ideology.”



    However, in the leaked discussion thread, a member of Google’s “trust & safety” team, Daniel Aaronson, admitted that the company maintains “huge teams” that work to adjust search results for subjects that are “prone to hyperbolic content, misleading information, and offensive content” – all subjective terms that are frequently used to suppress right-leaning sources.

    He also admitted that the interventions weren’t confined to YouTube – they included search results delivered via Google Assistant, Google Home, and in rare cases Google ’s organic search results.

    In the thread, Aaronson attempted to explain how search blacklisting worked. He claimed that highly specific searches would generate non-blacklisted results, even controversial ones. But the inclusion of highly specific terms in the YouTube blacklist, like “David Hogg cant remember his lines” – the name of an actual viral video – seems to contradict this.

    Aaronson’s full post is copied below:

    I work in Trust and Safety and while I have no particular input as to exactly what’s happening for YT I can try to explain why you’d have this kind of list and why people are finding lists like these on Code Search.

    When dealing with abuse/controversial content on various mediums you have several levers to deal with problems. Two prominent levers are “Proactive” and “Reactive”:


    Remainder of article here:

    https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/...t-smoking-gun/
    Attached Images Attached Images

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SiteUptime Web Site Monitoring Service