Loading...
Remove Text Formatting

Likes Likes:  17
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Wheel weight vs. Contact patch...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Super Moderator Stephen06GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    10,997

    Wheel weight vs. Contact patch...

    What would you choose:

    Option 1: 275/40/18 tire on a 10” wide wheel, 65 pounds

    Option 2: 255/45/18 tire on a 8.5” wide wheel, 53.5 pounds

    Same tire compound for either set up and this would be a square set.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator newbiestangowner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Burlington,Ont
    Posts
    3,653

    Wheel weight vs. Contact patch...

    For a total of 11.5 lbs difference I choose 275- contact patch and I like the look over weight saving
    Lol - slo turd ain’t gonna be that faster anyway or win prize money

    WAIT that’s 11.5 per wheel!46 lbs total , hmmmm

    I’ll be going 285 square 18x10 for track set up
    Possibly 19x10 285
    I wanna get u guys input as well later before I buy


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    2014 GT- MT 82, 3.73,Roush a/b, Forgestar f14 19x9/10 firestone firehawk indy 500- 255 F /285 R ,BMR springs sp009, pan hard, koni yellows ,m/m caster,
    MGW XSPEC low profile 2.625in throw
    slo turd 5.0, even slower driver

  3. #3
    Admin ZR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Toronto, On
    Posts
    36,736
    If it's a one set for all around use, choose the lighter wheel n tire combo hands down.

  4. #4
    nom nom nom RedSN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Markham
    Posts
    11,100
    IMO... depends on your setup. If you have tons of power you can’t use anyway, go for more rubber at the expense of the unsprung weight.
    If you are short on power, take the weight savings.
    -Don____________

  5. #5
    Member Minaccia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Keswick
    Posts
    799
    The engineer said what I wanted to say, thanks Don.

    Quote Originally Posted by RedSN View Post
    IMO... depends on your setup. If you have tons of power you can’t use anyway, go for more rubber at the expense of the unsprung weight.
    If you are short on power, take the weight savings.
    Barone Performance
    Canada's Online Aftermarket Parts Store

  6. #6
    Super Moderator Scrape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    GT-A
    Posts
    9,264
    I also agree with this statement. Apex Rims are on sale and are relatively in expensive and very light.
    Quote Originally Posted by RedSN View Post
    IMO... depends on your setup. If you have tons of power you can’t use anyway, go for more rubber at the expense of the unsprung weight.
    If you are short on power, take the weight savings.

  7. #7
    Dech Boy Zippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    5,016
    It's an interesting question for sure. I can see pros and cons for both.

    98 GT - Bright Atlantic Blue 'Dech'

  8. #8
    Super Moderator newbiestangowner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Burlington,Ont
    Posts
    3,653

    Wheel weight vs. Contact patch...

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippy View Post
    It's an interesting question for sure. I can see pros and cons for both.
    Agree- light vs wide

    I ditched the factory heavy wheels , but was able to go lighter ,AND wider, because of wheel choice ;
    world of difference in handling,grip, and putting power down without overwhelming the rear.

    Just 255’s look skinny on MY car
    ( running 255 front, 285 rear)


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    2014 GT- MT 82, 3.73,Roush a/b, Forgestar f14 19x9/10 firestone firehawk indy 500- 255 F /285 R ,BMR springs sp009, pan hard, koni yellows ,m/m caster,
    MGW XSPEC low profile 2.625in throw
    slo turd 5.0, even slower driver

  9. #9
    Club Supporter
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Mt Albert
    Posts
    492
    My smaller and lighter setup works much better for me than my larger heavier setup did. My 17” setup saved me 10lbs a corner over my 18’s.

  10. #10
    Club Supporter FABMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Woodbridge
    Posts
    1,240
    I like wide tires and the grip they provide, plus I am bias because a 275 on the back of an S550 looks like you are running on space saver spares.

    I went with a lighter 19x10 and 19x11” flow formed rim but run a staggering set (for the street) Nitto INVO 285 front and 325 rear. I plan to get a second pair of 285 rears for track use only.
    FABMAN

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SiteUptime Web Site Monitoring Service