Loading...
|
Likes: 167
I just saw a satellite "animation" or progression of shots where all the fires start simultaneously. I see your point. Kinda impossible for all to start at the same time.
I suppose you could still blame it on climate change. The arsonists are so invested in the climate change narrative they were driven to start fires.
there was a video clip circulating that shows dozens of plumes of smoke all starting at the same time, true or not, i dont know but the implication is that there were started by someone or multiple somones.
Would be nice if they were more specific.
They say arson or deliberately set. But then always dive into burn bans
So are these fires being s caused by someone deliberately setting a forest on fire, or by accident because someone had a camp fire that got out of control
I’m guessing the lady in Alberta wasn’t just having 19 different campfires. So what was her motivation to set these fires. Is she crazy or political?
A campfire getting out of control sounds like an accident, not deliberately setOriginally Posted by 5.4MarkVIII
Depends on what wording fits the narrative best.
If you intentionally go for a drive and get into an unexpected collision, it's called an accident, not intentional. Considering they banned hiking and all other recreational land users I'd say they're on narrative.
watching the opposite side of the narrative coin is helpful
https://thehighwire.com/watch/
realizing that this too is a narrative is helpful in seeing everything on both sides has bias.
NASA global fire map. Looks like grounds for a "climate lockdown".
firms.jpg
https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov...@-21.8,12.5,3z
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote