Loading...
Remove Text Formatting

Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: 2015 Mustang weight 3705 lbs ?

  1. #1
    tulowd
    Guest

    2015 Mustang weight 3705 lbs ?

    Just saw this on Summit Racing's FB page:
    http://www.onallcylinders.com/2014/0...ger-rt-choose/

    3705 lbs is friggin tubby; this is presumably without fuel, driver or other fluids? Add 250 lbs, so you can safely say its 4000 lbs fully loaded ready to drive.

  2. #2
    Member bluetoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    1,196
    I can't believe anyone actually thought the mustang was going to be lighter than before

  3. #3
    Mustang Occasionally
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    At my home.
    Posts
    2,843
    My guess is that would be curb weight, with all fluids and such.

    Still heavier than I expected tho.

    The reason everyone was expecting a less portly car is because the rumours suggested Ford was looking to chop off a couple hundred pounds, aiming for the 3300lb mark.

    http://www.edmunds.com/car-news/2015...on-a-diet.html

    http://jalopnik.com/everything-you-n...ang-1473953050

    http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...ent-car-report

  4. #4
    tulowd
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Armen View Post
    My guess is that would be curb weight, with all fluids and such.

    Still heavier than I expected tho.

    The reason everyone was expecting a less portly car is because the rumours suggested Ford was looking to chop off a couple hundred pounds, aiming for the 3300lb mark.

    http://www.edmunds.com/car-news/2015...on-a-diet.html

    http://jalopnik.com/everything-you-n...ang-1473953050

    http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...ent-car-report
    but without driver, correcto?

  5. #5
    Mustang Occasionally
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    At my home.
    Posts
    2,843
    Quote Originally Posted by tulowd View Post
    but without driver, correcto?
    Correct. No driver.

  6. #6
    Admin ZR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Toronto, On
    Posts
    36,736
    With the technology and light wt components available to them, mark me down as surprised Ford was unable / unwilling to trim it down wt wise.

  7. #7
    Arboc
    Guest
    ^^^ because they would have to trim it up cost wise

  8. #8
    Super Moderator Stephen06GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    10,997
    Quote Originally Posted by ZR View Post
    With the technology and light wt components available to them, mark me down as surprised Ford was unable / unwilling to trim it down wt wise.
    Maybe they are waiting to see how the aluminum F150 works out.

  9. #9
    Off my meds again
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Cancuckistan
    Posts
    1,771
    Quote Originally Posted by ZR View Post
    With the technology and light wt components available to them, mark me down as surprised Ford was unable / unwilling to trim it down wt wise.
    They could've done it by keeping all the unnecessary tech crap out of it.

  10. #10
    Slope
    Guest
    Just drag the dies back out for the Aero-nosed Foxes already...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SiteUptime Web Site Monitoring Service