Loading...
Remove Text Formatting

Likes Likes:  1
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 55

Thread: What's your Fox H/C/I combo

  1. #31
    Member 1BAD92LX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    North Bay
    Posts
    1,169
    This whole thread is Rick and Rob's faults for taking me for rides around the track in there cars and feeling how fast I could go with more power

    Paul - engine in stock position and arms for stock track width and wheel base. Feel huge turn in difference and little more cornering grip. Alignment settings basically the same since stock track width and wheel base. Whole car feels stiffer.

  2. #32
    nom nom nom RedSN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Markham
    Posts
    11,125
    Quote Originally Posted by 1BAD92LX View Post
    This whole thread is Rick and Rob's faults


    thinking about it, it IS Rob's fault. LOL
    -Don____________

  3. #33
    Admin ZR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Toronto, On
    Posts
    36,973
    How did I get involved again?? LOL

  4. #34
    Admin ZR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Toronto, On
    Posts
    36,973
    Brad, bitch picked up a bunch of sqeeze at the fall dyno tune.

  5. #35
    Member 1BAD92LX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    North Bay
    Posts
    1,169
    Awesome, I'll reserve my spot in the passenger seat now for the spring tack day

  6. #36
    Member Hutch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    636
    My short block is stock. I have trick flow heads, roller rockers, E303 cam, trick flow R intake, 75mm accufab TB and fuel pressure reg, with anderson N/A pipe cold air pipe with 80mm Pro-M meter and 24b injectors.
    I really like this set up. The car rev's really well and lots of top end power. I wanted my power up in the rpm range and this intake flows great for that. I would totally recommend it for your type of driving Brad
    Saleen 89-373....long gone....!!

  7. #37
    Member 98 Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    oshawa
    Posts
    297
    Edelbrock performer rpm heads 2.02/1.60
    B cam with 1.7 rockers
    PSP ported cobra intake
    acufab 75mm tb
    pmas 95 mm meter
    42lbs injectors.

    if i where to build another pushrod motor it would be

    331 block
    performer rpm 1.90/1.60
    custom or anderson cam with spec'd ratio rockers
    holley system max intake if n/a
    or a kenne bell if boosted

  8. #38
    Member 1BAD92LX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    North Bay
    Posts
    1,169
    As much as I would like to do something different, it looks like the trick flow top end kits are the best price.

  9. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Burlington!
    Posts
    1,020
    Totally off topic but it did come up in the thread...are the MM front lower control arms much lighter than stock?

  10. #40
    nom nom nom RedSN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Markham
    Posts
    11,125
    Once a Mustang has been converted to front coil-overs, there is no need for a front control arm designed to hold the spring, and therefore the weight of the car, in the center of its span. When the spring is no longer located on the control arm, the design requirements for the arm change, allowing for a much lighter weight control arm.

    Stock Ford arms weigh 14-3/4 lbs. each. MM tubular arms weigh 8 pounds each, for a total weight savings of 13-1/2 lb from the control arms alone. Additional weight is saved from the installation of the front coil-over kit.
    http://www.maximummotorsports.com/te...ntrol_arm.aspx

    Almost 1/2 the weight of stock.
    -Don____________

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SiteUptime Web Site Monitoring Service