50th Anniversary Challenger Scatpack

[Gr8Stang]

Not a Dodge guy, but this is a sweet looking ride. Might even handle some road curves.

[Scrape]

Challengers are sweet rides. My SRT 392 was a beast. Scared the $#@* out me a few times. It had the 275’s on it and traction was definitely not on my side. I am sure the 305’s help.

[Hotford]

Just like GM they can't count either......just a marketing scheme……...how can you call it 50th year anniversary when the car stopped production in 76??, you only get to call it 50 anniversary if you have been building it for 50 years!

what a bunch of clowns!!!

[fast Ed]

The original version was done after 1974 model year. Most people forget about or aren't aware of these that were offered from 77-83 though, a rebadged Mitsubishi product:

[Hotford]

^^^^^^^^^OHH ya I forgot about those ugly turds !!! they still can't count!^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[fast Ed]

They were the Mustang II of the Challenger lineup for sure, but they didn't sell nearly as many of course.

[Ponyryd]

Despite the 50th Ann concerns that looks like a pretty cool car, I love all the little touches that they add to make the car special, the wheels look sick, as well as the body-colour shaker with the black hood and roof. I like it, a lot.

[fast Ed]

Great looking car for sure. With all that weight and power they can certainly use the 305 rubber all around that fits with the flares.

[Gr8Stang]

Just like GM they can't count either......just a marketing scheme……...how can you call it 50th year anniversary when the car stopped production in 76??, you only get to call it 50 anniversary if you have been building it for 50 years!

what a bunch of clowns!!!

LOL! Good point. Gotta love the marketing dept. people. Someone should call them on that one.....

[Gr8Stang]

The original version was done after 1974 model year. Most people forget about or aren't aware of these that were offered from 77-83 though, a rebadged Mitsubishi product:

Think I'd want to forget about it as well. LOL!