PDA

View Full Version : So check this one out.



ZR
10-27-2017, 06:45 AM
Nice, attacking Canadians at the Federal level seems about in line with what we are seeing provincially as well. Guess we need to pay for him standing at the airport last year n handing out jackets and the such. Don't get me wrong, not against lending a hand to those in need just sick n tired of them doing it when we aren't in a position to look after everyone at home first. Let's not forget the insane amount they just spent on the new budget cover either.


Health groups joined forces on Sunday with the Conservative opposition to accuse the Liberal government of trying to raise tax revenue on the backs of vulnerable diabetics.
The accusation opened a new front in the ongoing opposition-waged war on government taxation policy, amid the backdrop of the conflict-of-interest controversy dogging Finance Minister Bill Morneau over whether he's properly distanced himself from millions of dollars of private sector assets.
Diabetes Canada was among the groups that joined Conservative politicians to publicly denounce what they say is a clawback of a long-standing disability tax credit to help them manage a disease that can cost the average person with diabetes $15,000 annually.
Conservative finance critic Pierre Poilievre branded it as one more example of an out-of-touch Liberal government that he characterized as unfairly targeting the hardworking middle class people it claims to support.


Conservative leader Scheer decries 'irony' of small business tax plan (http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/andrew-scheer-waterloo-region-small-business-chamber-of-commerce-tax-1.4363732)

"His tax department tried to tax the employee discounts of waitresses and cashiers. Now his government is targeting vulnerable people suffering with diabetes with thousands of dollars in tax increases," Poilievre said on Sunday at a Parliament Hill news conference flanked by fellow Conservative critics, a young diabetic constituent and a top official with a leading diabetes advocacy organization.
In May, the revenue department stopped approving a disability tax credit for people with Type 1 diabetes for those who had previously claimed it, he said.
Insulin therapyPeople who need more than 14 hours per week for insulin therapy, and had a doctor's certification previously qualified. But other than citing a spike in applications for the benefit, the government offered no explanation for the change during initial interactions earlier this spring, said Kimberley Hanson of Diabetes Canada.
Thousands of claimants from across Canada who had previously been given the $1,500 annual benefit have been rejected in recent months, but Hanson said she can't get an exact number from Canadian Revenue Agency and has had to file an Access to Information request to find out.
In recent months, the agency officials and Minister Diane Lebouthillier have for the most part rebuffed their overtures.
"Over the past two months, she's stopped responding to my messages and answering some of my questions," Hanson said, referring to one senior department official.
On Saturday, a senior department official reached out to her to reopen dialogue, she said. Poilievre said that only happened because the matter was raised briefly on Friday by the Conservatives during Question Period.
The minister's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Sunday.

RedSN
10-27-2017, 08:50 AM
Don't get me wrong, not against lending a hand to those in need just sick n tired of them doing it when we aren't in a position to look after everyone at home first.
So you're against giving diabetics a tax break?

ZR
10-27-2017, 08:54 AM
Since Kath is a lifetime diabetic, nope. Against tossing money into the wind to support every corner of the world before we look after those at home.

RedSN
10-27-2017, 08:58 AM
Sorry. Misinterpreted your rant against some unspecified government spending and the linked article above.

ZR
10-27-2017, 09:56 AM
No worries.
Half the time need to read my posts 16 times to understand as well. ;)