Trudeaus motorcade just held me up from getting in my work parking garage.....what a wh.......*sarcasm*
Printable View
Trudeaus motorcade just held me up from getting in my work parking garage.....what a wh.......*sarcasm*
Isn't that the way democracy works?
You vote for the political party / representatives that will enact legislation that you are in favour of?
Even school kids understand how this concept works.
https://glossnroses.files.wordpress....-for-pedro.jpg
Yes but I think there is a fundamental difference between legislation that can help people, the economy, and/or the country. (As an example legislation for medicinal marijuana.)
And legislation that legalizes a dangerous substance to buy votes and pad the pockets of your friends.
I put that in the same page as canceling gas plants to buy votes. It's not democracy it's corruption.
Your bang in right with the fact that punishment is different. There fore it's not unreasonable to say that there could potentially be a law that denies healthcare if a person is caught breaking a law and has caused harm to themselves that would other wise cost taxpayers.
Get sick From illegal drugs. No healthcare For the ailments caused by taking the drugs.
Get drunk and roll your car no healthcare for the injuries sustained
Dosnt mean that you lose healthcare if you get a speeding ticket. Or get caught shoplifting. Or even rob a bank. ( unless you get shot in the process.)
If you get sick from smoking pot ....do they prescribe pot?
If if a dr feels that it will help elevate symptoms of lung cancer. Then it's possible. I suppose.
Most drs prescribing pot are stressing against smoking it in any form. The safest and most effective way to take it is absorbtion via suppository. (According to an artical I was reading a couple weeks ago.)
Im confused. If you see legislation to change laws in an attempt to save taxpayers money as a slippery slope. How do you not see legislation to change laws in an attempt to buy votes as an equally slippery slope.
I'm also curious on our opinion of that fact that the Feds. Said that if/when it's legalized it will be put in the hands of the provincial governments to manage.
What's your take on the provincial liberals going at this. Considering their track record with pretty much everything else they have "handled"